Flannigan v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Flannigan v. State

167 S.W. 1113

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided May 27, 1914·No. No. 3143·Published

Opinion

DAVIDSON, J.

Appellant was convicted of a felony theft, his punishment being assessed at two years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

The appeal is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. In the absence of a statement of facts and bills of exception, the matters set out in the motion for new trial are not reviewable.

As the record is presented the judgment will' be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAVIDSON, J.

Appellant was convicted of a felony theft, his punishment being assessed at two years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

The appeal is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. In the absence of a statement of facts and bills of exception, the matters set out in the motion for new trial are not reviewable.

As the record is presented the judgment will' be affirmed.

Flannigan v. State, 167 S.W. 1113 (Tex. 1914).

Pincite

167 S.W. 1113 (Flannigan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.