Flannery v. Van Tassel

16 N.Y.S. 741, 42 N.Y. St. Rep. 916, 62 Hun 621, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2218
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 14, 1891
StatusPublished

This text of 16 N.Y.S. 741 (Flannery v. Van Tassel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Flannery v. Van Tassel, 16 N.Y.S. 741, 42 N.Y. St. Rep. 916, 62 Hun 621, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2218 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1891).

Opinion

Pratt, J.

Th ere was ample evidence of an actual change of possession of the chattels, and it appeared that a good consideration existed for the transfer. Plaintiff has actually paid out upwards of $1,500 on account of his liability for McManus. Whether he could be held to account for any excess of the proceeds of the goods over the debt is not now important; for the recovery is far below the consideration plaintiff was compelled to pay. There are no valid exceptions, and we are satisfied with the verdict. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 N.Y.S. 741, 42 N.Y. St. Rep. 916, 62 Hun 621, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flannery-v-van-tassel-nysupct-1891.