Flannery v. SINGER ASSET FINANCE COMPANY, LLC
This text of 23 A.3d 1242 (Flannery v. SINGER ASSET FINANCE COMPANY, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
John D. FLANNERY
v.
SINGER ASSET FINANCE COMPANY, LLC, et al.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Thomas P. Willcutts, Hartford, in support of the petition.
John H. Van Lenten, Bridgeport, in opposition.
The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 128 Conn.App. 507, 17 A.3d 509, is granted, limited to the following issues:
"1. Did the Appellate Court properly determine, in a case alleging that the defendant aided and abetted the codefendant attorneys in a breach of their fiduciary duty, that the allegations contained in both the plaintiff's complaint and in avoidance of a statute of limitations defense were insufficient to invoke the continuous course of conduct doctrine as a means of toiling the statute of limitations?
"2. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the three year statute of limitations period for actions brought under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act, General Statutes § 42-110a et seq., cannot be tolled?"
*1243 ZARELLA, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 A.3d 1242, 302 Conn. 902, 2011 Conn. LEXIS 329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flannery-v-singer-asset-finance-company-llc-conn-2011.