Flannell v. Kane
573 A.2d 356, 21 Conn. App. 819, 1990 Conn. App. LEXIS 137
This text of 573 A.2d 356 (Flannell v. Kane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Flannell v. Kane, 573 A.2d 356, 21 Conn. App. 819, 1990 Conn. App. LEXIS 137 (Colo. Ct. App. 1990).
Opinion
After oral argument, both parties concede that the issues raised in the named defendant’s appeal from the trial court’s granting of the plaintiffs’ motion to extend the sale date, now past, in the underlying foreclosure action are now moot.
The appeal is dismissed and the case is remanded to the trial court for a new sale date to be set.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Greenpoint Mortgage v. Cusack, No. Cv 35 25 14 (a.C. 19312) (Apr. 29, 1999)
1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 4351 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1999)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
573 A.2d 356, 21 Conn. App. 819, 1990 Conn. App. LEXIS 137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flannell-v-kane-connappct-1990.