Flaningham v. Hogue

44 N.E. 394, 162 Ill. 129
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedJune 13, 1896
StatusPublished

This text of 44 N.E. 394 (Flaningham v. Hogue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Flaningham v. Hogue, 44 N.E. 394, 162 Ill. 129 (Ill. 1896).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Baker

delivered the opinion of the court:

This was an action in debt, brought by A. L. Flaningham, against C. Eugene Hogue, in the circuit court of Cook county, to recover a balance claimed to be due on a judgment rendered July 22, 1885, in the same court, for $901.69, in favor of the former and against the latter. By agreement of the parties the cause was tried before the court without a jury, and the court rendered judgement in favor of the defendant. The Appellate Court affirmed that judgment, and the cause is brought here by writ of error.

By the judgments below the facts in the case have been settled adversely to the plaintiff in error.

No written propositions to be held as law by the trial court in the decision of the case'-were submitted to the court and no questions of law were otherwise raised, consequently there is no question presented by the record for our determination. Bank of Michigan City v. Haskell, 124 Ill. 587; Myers v. Union Nat. Bank, 128 id. 478; Consolidated Coal Co. v. Peers, 150 id. 344.

The judgment of the Appellate Court will therefore be affirmed.

„Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

First National Bank v. Haskell
124 Ill. 587 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1888)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
44 N.E. 394, 162 Ill. 129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flaningham-v-hogue-ill-1896.