Flanigan v. United States

332 F. App'x 11
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 2, 2009·No. No. 09-6536·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Brunell Flanigan appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), without prejudice for failure to comply with a court order. We [12] have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Flanigan v. United States, No. 2:08-cv-00446-MSD-TEM (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 6, 2009 & entered Mar. 9, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Flanigan v. United States, 332 F. App'x 11 (4th Cir. 2009).

332 F. App'x 11 (Flanigan v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related