Flanigan v. United States

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: September 2, 2009
• Docket: 09-6536
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6536

MICHAEL BRUNELL FLANIGAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; HARLEY LAPPIN; OFFICER SMITH; LIEUTENANT BROE; BOP; LIEUTENANT NEGRON; A. JOSEPH; D. TOWNES; R.E. HOLT; T. THOMAS; VANESSA ADAMS; KAREN WHITE; HARRELL WATTS; DR. B. RICE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District Judge. (2:08-cv-00446-MSD-TEM)

Submitted: August 26, 2009 Decided: September 2, 2009

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Brunell Flanigan, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Michael Brunell Flanigan appeals the district court’s

order dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six

Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388

(1971), without prejudice for failure to comply with a court

order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. See Flanigan v. United States, No. 2:08-cv-

00446-MSD-TEM (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 6, 2009 & entered Mar. 9,

2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED