Flanigan v. State
127 So. 919, 23 Ala. App. 627
This text of 127 So. 919 (Flanigan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Flanigan v. State, 127 So. 919, 23 Ala. App. 627 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).
Opinion
The conflicting evidence adduced upon the trial of this case made a jury question and rendered inapt the affirmative charge requested by appellant. This is the only point of decision presented on this appeal, which is from a judgment of conviction for distilling, making, or manufacturing alcoholic or spirituous liquors. Said judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
127 So. 919, 23 Ala. App. 627, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flanigan-v-state-alactapp-1930.