Flanigan v. Panaguiten

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: February 17, 2011
• Docket: 10-6416
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6416

MICHAEL BRUNELL FLANIGAN,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

ELIZABETH PANAGUITEN, MLP; J. D. ALLEN, Clinical Director; VANESSA P. ADAMS, Warden; HARRELL WATTS, Administrator National Inmate Appeals; KIM WHITE, Southeast Regional Director; Y. APONTE, Assistant Health Services Administrator; S. DESROCHERS,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, General Accounting Office; FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District Judge. (2:08-cv-00169-MSD-TEM)

Submitted: February 10, 2011 Decided: February 17, 2011

Before WILKINSON and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Brunell Flanigan, Appellant Pro Se. George Maralan Kelley, III, Assistant United States Attorney, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Michael Brunell Flanigan appeals the district court’s

order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to

Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,

403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Flanigan’s

motion to supplement the record, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. Flanigan v. Panaguiten, No. 2:08-

cv-00169-MSD-TEM (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 2, 2010 & entered Feb. 3,

2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED