Flanigan v. Hutchins

Supreme Court of Georgia

Flanigan v. Hutchins

143 S.E. 596, 166 Ga. 491, 1928 Ga. LEXIS 336

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJune 12, 1928

DocketNo. 6274

StatusPublished

This text of 143 S.E. 596 (Flanigan v. Hutchins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Flanigan v. Hutchins, 143 S.E. 596, 166 Ga. 491, 1928 Ga. LEXIS 336 (Ga. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

Hiel, J.

The exception in this ease is to a judgment dismissing an affidavit of illegality for “insufficiency.” The affidavit of illegality contains no grounds, equitable or otherwise, that would give the Supreme Court jurisdiction of the case; and it is therefore transferred to the Court of Appeals for consideration and determination.

Transferred to the Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur. M. D. Irwin and O. A. Nix, for plaintiff in error. N. L. Hutchins and W. L. Nix, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hiel, J.

The exception in this ease is to a judgment dismissing an affidavit of illegality for “insufficiency.” The affidavit of illegality contains no grounds, equitable or otherwise, that would give the Supreme Court jurisdiction of the case; and it is therefore transferred to the Court of Appeals for consideration and determination.

Transferred to the Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur. M. D. Irwin and O. A. Nix, for plaintiff in error. N. L. Hutchins and W. L. Nix, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

143 S.E. 596, 166 Ga. 491, 1928 Ga. LEXIS 336, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flanigan-v-hutchins-ga-1928.