Flanigan v. Fayetteville State University

Fourth Circuit

Flanigan v. Fayetteville State University

668 F. App'x 505

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 13, 2016

DocketNo. 16-1170, No. 16-1171

StatusPublished

This text of 668 F. App'x 505 (Flanigan v. Fayetteville State University) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Flanigan v. Fayetteville State University, 668 F. App'x 505 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Patricia Griffieth Flanigan appeals the district court’s order granting Fayetteville State University’s motions to dismiss her [506]*506harassment and retaliation claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012). We have considered the parties’ arguments and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Flanigan v, Fayetteville State Univ., Nos. 5:15-cv-00448-FL, 5:15-cv-00527-FL, 2016 WL 224107 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 19, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Patricia Griffieth Flanigan appeals the district court’s order granting Fayetteville State University’s motions to dismiss her [506]*506harassment and retaliation claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012). We have considered the parties’ arguments and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Flanigan v, Fayetteville State Univ., Nos. 5:15-cv-00448-FL, 5:15-cv-00527-FL, 2016 WL 224107 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 19, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

668 F. App'x 505, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flanigan-v-fayetteville-state-university-ca4-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack