Flanigan v. Duncan
49 N.W. 981, 47 Minn. 250, 1891 Minn. LEXIS 459
Opinion
As to the fact of service of the summons, the affidavits were in direct conflict, presenting a fair and rather close question on the fact. Following the invariable practice of this court in such cases, we sustain the finding of the court below. There is nothing in the other points made requiring notice.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Flanigan v. Duncan, 49 N.W. 981, 47 Minn. 250, 1891 Minn. LEXIS 459 (Mich. 1891).
49 N.W. 981 (Flanigan v. Duncan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jennrich v. Moeller
234 N.W. 638 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1931)
Glauber v. Wallace
116 N.W. 107 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1908)