Flandreau v. White

18 Cal. 639, 1861 Cal. LEXIS 259
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1861
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 18 Cal. 639 (Flandreau v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Flandreau v. White, 18 Cal. 639, 1861 Cal. LEXIS 259 (Cal. 1861).

Opinion

Baldwin, J. delivered the opinion of the Court

Field, C. J. and Cope, J. concurring.

Judgment affirmed. The suit was not brought within six months from the expiration of the credit. The mere filing of a complaint is not sufficient to constitute a suit brought within the meaning of the Mechanics’ Lien Law. The filing of the complaint and the issuing of the summons are required by the General Practice Act, and the provision in the General Limitation Act, (Wood’s Dig. 45) that the filing of the complaint shall* be deemed a commencement of the suit, applies to that act only, and not to the Mechanics’ Lien Law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Burns v. White Swan Mining Co.
57 P. 637 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1899)
Pacific Coast Railway Co. v. Porter
15 P. 774 (California Supreme Court, 1887)
Flandreau v. Downey
23 Cal. 354 (California Supreme Court, 1863)
Van Winkle v. Grimm
23 Cal. 457 (California Supreme Court, 1863)
Sharp v. Maguire
19 Cal. 577 (California Supreme Court, 1862)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 Cal. 639, 1861 Cal. LEXIS 259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flandreau-v-white-cal-1861.