Flanders v. Thompson

Superior Court of New Hampshire

Flanders v. Thompson

2 N.H. 421

CourtSuperior Court of New Hampshire

DecidedNovember 15, 1821

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 2 N.H. 421 (Flanders v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Flanders v. Thompson, 2 N.H. 421 (N.H. Super. Ct. 1821).

Pincite

Opinion

By the court.

There is no pretence for the supposition that the certificate of the magistrates, is conclusive evidence of notice to Flanders, So far from this, it would not in our opinion be competent evidence to go to a jury to prove that fact.(l) And there is as little pretence that the notice was in this case sufficient. It might as well have been left at any other house in the county as at the house where it was left. Flanders resided within the state, and his attorney in Lancaster. Actual notice might have been given to one of them. There must be

Judgment for the plaintiff,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the court.

There is no pretence for the supposition that the certificate of the magistrates, is conclusive evidence of notice to Flanders, So far from this, it would not in our opinion be competent evidence to go to a jury to prove that fact.(l) And there is as little pretence that the notice was in this case sufficient. It might as well have been left at any other house in the county as at the house where it was left. Flanders resided within the state, and his attorney in Lancaster. Actual notice might have been given to one of them. There must be

Judgment for the plaintiff,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 N.H. 421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flanders-v-thompson-nhsuperct-1821.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack