Flanders v. State

1924 OK CR 41, 223 P. 202, 26 Okla. Crim. 163, 1924 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 45
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedFebruary 16, 1924
DocketNo. A-4141.
StatusPublished

This text of 1924 OK CR 41 (Flanders v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Flanders v. State, 1924 OK CR 41, 223 P. 202, 26 Okla. Crim. 163, 1924 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 45 (Okla. Ct. App. 1924).

Opinion

DOYLE, J.

The plaintiff in error was tried for cattle theft, upon an information charging that he did March 28, 1921, take, steal, and carry away one bull calf and one heifer calf, the personal property of Hutton Vore. The jury returned a verdict finding him guilty as charged in the information and assessing his punishment at imprisonment in the peniteniary for a term of two years. He has appealed from the judgment rendered upon such conviction.

The first contention is that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdict.

The testimony shows that defendant’s place adjoins that of the prosecuting witness, Vore, their houses were about a mile and a half apart. Vore had a large number of cattle, all but about fifty of which he moved to a pasture in the Osage, and returned Saturday evening, March 26, 1921. Vore testified:

*164 “ I had a little bull calf and a little white-face heifer calf that always stayed together, running on the wheat field. I missed them Monday after returning from the Osage; the next day I found the heifer on defendant’s wheat and drove it home; the following day George Cotner, who works for me, brought the little bull calf home; it had a yoke on and had an undercrop out of each ear. The bull calf was put in a lot, and I told Cotner to leave him there until I got back from Kansas City; I didn’t want any one to see him. The calf remained there 10 days; on the 7th of April I took the calf to Jack Morrell’s place and put it in his horse lot; Jim Triethart assisted me; my father has a place between Jack Morrell’s place and the defendant’s place. Morrell’s place is 2y2 miles south of me. I rode west a mile and a half to where Morrell was fixing fence, and I told him what I had done; the next morning I went to a hill a mile south of my place and laid down; after a while I decided I was in the wrong place, and went another mile south and about a quarter east to the top of another hill in the corner of defendant’s pasture. As I was laying there I saw two men driving two animals aeross Morrell’s pasture; I watched them until they came out of Morrell’s gate, and they went out of sight; in a few minutes I saw two calves coming out of the brush, about a quarter of a mile from me; I saw defendant open a gate to run these two calves into a field; the little bull calf jumped through the fence, and the heifer calf went through the gate into Bill Triethart’s pasture. I rode down. Nelse Whitmire, a colored man, was standing there; I asked him if he wanted to see a cow thief caught, and he said he did. I rode around to where defendant had just fixed the fence where the calf jumped through; I said, ‘Hello, Charley, have you had a few of them out?’ He said, ‘Yes, I had a couple of calves gone so long I thought they were dead.’ I said, ‘Charley, you don’t mean to tell me that little bull calf is yours?’ He said, ‘No, Hut; that calf is not mine; I told George Cotner yesterday that I had marked that calf through a mistake; I told the boys that helped me yesterday that I had marked the wrong calf, and I told Jack Morrell a few minutes ago that I had marked that calf through a mistake.’ I said, *165 ‘Yes, I know that; I have been watching you all day.’ I stood up in my stirrups, and said: ‘Charley, haven’t I told you I would kill you if I caught you stealing my cattle?’
“He said, ‘Yes; but I marked that calf through a mistake; you come with me and see another one like it that is mine, and you will not feel so bad about it.’ He claimed that he had one just like it. I said, ‘I have come to take that calf home; let’s look at that other calf;’ and we started up the pasture to look at the other calf. We rode along and I said, ‘You are an amateur in this game; you are just the goat; the brains have been staying at home; they are getting you and a few more boys to drive these calves through the country and will probably slip you $25, and if it is a big deal they will slip you $50.’ He said, ‘I never did drive any cattle, Hut; you ought not to feel that way towards me.’ We went by Charley’s place. He said, ‘Let’s leave your calf here and look at the other one.’ I said, ‘No; there is only one way to look at that, and that is throw them together;’ and we drove it up there. He said, ‘Don’t they look alike?’ I said, ‘Nothing, only their white faces; my calf is a motley-faced calf, and yours is a pure white-face calf.’ So I went on then.”

He further testified:

“His calf might have been a month or two younger than mine. He was sucking his mother and was in good shape, and my calf was a thief calf that had been rustling for himself. His calf was a white-face calf, just a small ring around its left eye. My calf was a lighter red than his, and had a red spot around its eye half .as big as your hand. We rode north. I told him, ‘You talked me out of prosecuting Eusty Hodge on the steer that he stole and shipped from Edna; you talked me out of that, and you are not going to talk me out of this.’ He said, ‘You don’t think I had anything to do with that?’ I said, ‘Nothing, only you talked me out of prosecuting him.’ I said, ‘If you get out of this, it will be by the skin of your teeth, and you had better get the best damn lawyer in the state.’ He said: ‘Hut, rather than have you believe I stole that calf, I would give you 4 or 5 *166 times the worth of that calf to get you not to think I tried to steal it.’ I said, ‘Yes, I guess' you would give me 10 or 15 times the worth of it for me to keep my damn mouth shut, but you will not do it,’ and I rode off and left him.”

He further testified the heifer calf that he had that day “was not my calf; that I judge belonged to him.”

On cross-examination he stated:

“I don’t know that I was laying a trap; I told Morrell I had put a calf in his lot and for him to go to Charley and get his cow and see if that was his calf, and to tell Charley that some of his stuff.was with him.”

George Cotner testified that he worked for Yore; that he found the heifer calf on defendant’s wheat and found the bull calf in the defendant’s pasture, and that it was marked and yoked and had been castrated.

Jack Morrell testified that he went to defendant’s place to get a cow and told the defendant that there was a calf in his pasture with his earmark, and there was a heifer in the pasture that was claimed by the defendant and marked; that the bull calf in question was taken away by defendant; that to him the calves did not look alike, but it was possible to mistake them.

Jim Triethart testified that he was working on his father’s fence and saw defendant in company with his nephew Delbert; marking a calf, and that he saw the calf after it was yoked; that he helped Hutton Vore take a calf to Morrell’s two or three days afterwards.

Sam Balch testified that defendant ran from 50 to 200 cattle; that he saw both bull calves and they were about the same size, though defendant’s calf was fatter than Vore’s; that he had been a brand inspector at Kansas City and the calves were distinguishable, but possibly could be mistaken, but not probably.

*167 As a witness in Ms own behalf, defendant, Flanders, testified:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jeffries v. State
1914 OK CR 39 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1914)
State v. Muir
139 P. 1158 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1924 OK CR 41, 223 P. 202, 26 Okla. Crim. 163, 1924 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 45, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flanders-v-state-oklacrimapp-1924.