Flanders v. Fischer

105 A.D.3d 1238, 962 N.Y.S.2d 827
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 18, 2013
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 105 A.D.3d 1238 (Flanders v. Fischer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Flanders v. Fischer, 105 A.D.3d 1238, 962 N.Y.S.2d 827 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Following an investigation into an alleged drug ring, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with smuggling and drug [1239]*1239possession. He was found guilty as charged after a tier III disciplinary hearing, and the determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, testimony of the correction lieutenant who authored it, and confidential information provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Brown v Fischer, 98 AD3d 778, 779 [2012]; Matter of Boyle v Fischer, 89 AD3d 1268, 1268 [2011]). Contrary to petitioner’s contention, the lieutenant’s testimony regarding the confidential information and detailed nature of the information itself permitted the Hearing Officer to independently assess its reliability and credibility (see Matter of Vassell v Fischer, 48 AD3d 876, 876 [2008]; Matter of Sheppard v Goord, 292 AD2d 694, 695 [2002]). Petitioner’s remaining contentions, to the extent they are preserved for our review, have been examined and found to lack merit.

Mercure, J.P, Rose, Spain and McCarthy, JJ., concur.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Garcia v. Annucci
2017 NY Slip Op 7510 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
MatterofWelchvFischer
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
Welch v. Fischer
121 A.D.3d 1139 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Davila v. Prack
113 A.D.3d 978 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Williams v. Fischer
111 A.D.3d 1001 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Howard v. Prack
107 A.D.3d 1262 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
105 A.D.3d 1238, 962 N.Y.S.2d 827, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flanders-v-fischer-nyappdiv-2013.