Flanders v. Atlanta Terminal Co.
This text of 95 S.E. 307 (Flanders v. Atlanta Terminal Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case arose as an action to recover damages for alleged negligence of the defendant in maintaining steps in its railroad station for passengers to descend to reach trains. The steps were covered with rubber and iron that had grown sleek from use, and on the day of [813]*813the ■ alleged injury they were wet, and by reason thereof were more sleek. The plaintiff testified, that she was on her way down the steps, carrying several bundles, when suddenly she slipped and fell, suffering injuries; and that she did not know what caused her to fall. Her daughter testified, that she was with her at the time of the fall, but did not know what caused it; that about ten minutes after the plaintiff had fallen, arisen, and got on the train, the witness came back to ascend the steps, and while there made an examination and saw where a mark was made on the steps, as if some one had slipped; and that it appeared to be where the plaintiff had slipped,and fallen. Held: No presumption of negligence having been raised by proof of injury, the evidence did not sustain the petition and the allegations of negligence, and it was not error to grant a nonsuit.
Judgment affirmed on main till of exceptions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
95 S.E. 307, 21 Ga. App. 812, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 542, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flanders-v-atlanta-terminal-co-gactapp-1918.