Flanagan v. State
This text of 100 S.W.2d 1015 (Flanagan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Appellant was convicted of possessing for the purpose of sale spirituous intoxicating liquor in prohibited territory. In the record before us we find that the penalty assessed against appellant by the court was sixty days’ confinement in the county jail and a fine of one hundred dollars, but apparently no judgment was ever entered. If so, by oversight, it is not brought forward in the transcript. The record must contain' a judgment in order to give the appellate [492]*492court jurisdiction. 4 Tex. Jur., page 171, Tippins v. State, 86 Texas Crim. Rep., 205, 217 S. W., 380, and other authorities annotated in Tex. Jur. as above indicated.
The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
100 S.W.2d 1015, 131 Tex. Crim. 491, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 640, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flanagan-v-state-texcrimapp-1936.