Flanagan v. State

1931 OK CR 157, 297 P. 318, 50 Okla. Crim. 286, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 141
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedMarch 28, 1931
DocketNo. A-7721.
StatusPublished

This text of 1931 OK CR 157 (Flanagan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Flanagan v. State, 1931 OK CR 157, 297 P. 318, 50 Okla. Crim. 286, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 141 (Okla. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the district court of McCurtain county of the crime of a second and subsequent violation of the prohibitory liquor laws, and his punishment fixed by the court at a fine of $1,000 and confinement in the state penitentiary for 90 days.

Defendant contends that the evidence of the state is insufficient to support the verdict of the jury.

The information charged the defendant with the sale of one pint of whisky to C. J. McDougal and O. R. Holcomb, but does not allege any price or thing, of value given for such whisky.

Neither one of the boys alleged to have purchased this whisky was called as a witness by the state, and the other witnesses testifying admitted that they did not see the sale and did not know whether the defendant made one or not. This evidence was insufficient to establish the guilt of the defendant beyond a reasonable doubt.

The proof of the state having wholly failed, the cause is reversed.

DAVENPORT, P. J., concurs. EDWARDS, J., absent and not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1931 OK CR 157, 297 P. 318, 50 Okla. Crim. 286, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flanagan-v-state-oklacrimapp-1931.