Flanagan v. State

1925 OK CR 420, 240 P. 132, 32 Okla. Crim. 172, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 472
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedJuly 28, 1925
DocketNo. A-5092.
StatusPublished

This text of 1925 OK CR 420 (Flanagan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Flanagan v. State, 1925 OK CR 420, 240 P. 132, 32 Okla. Crim. 172, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 472 (Okla. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

DOYLE, J.

The plaintiff in error was tried and convicted, and, in accordance with the verdict of the jury, was sentenced to pay a fine of $350 and be confined for 60 days in the county jail on an information charging that in McCurtain county, August 17, 1923', 'Carl Flanagan did sell one quart of whisky to Willie Morris, Monroe Hilton, and Roscoe Hines.

A reversal of the judgment' is asked on tne ground •that the court erred in admitting certain testimony, and that the verdict is not sustained by sufficient evidence.

The state introduced five witnesses. An examination *173 of the record shows no exception taken to the rulings of the court on the admission of evidence. The defendant did not testify, and no evidence whatever was introduced on the part of the defense. There can be no doubt as to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction.

Finding no prejudicial error, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

BESSEY, P. J., and EDWARDS, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1925 OK CR 420, 240 P. 132, 32 Okla. Crim. 172, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 472, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flanagan-v-state-oklacrimapp-1925.