Flanagan v. State

389 So. 2d 5, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17399
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 15, 1980·No. No. 79-2298·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s conviction for uttering a forgery is reversed because the State failed to prove that she knew the check which she cashed was forged. In accordance with Heath v. State, 382 So.2d 391 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980), this cause is remanded with directions to discharge the appellant.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

MOORE, HERSEY and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Flanagan v. State, 389 So. 2d 5, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17399 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

389 So. 2d 5 (Flanagan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Heath v. State
382 So. 2d 391 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)