Flanagan v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.
32 Misc. 706, 65 N.Y.S. 1132
This text of 32 Misc. 706 (Flanagan v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Flanagan v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co., 32 Misc. 706, 65 N.Y.S. 1132 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).
Opinion
Defendant had the greater number of witnesses, but plaintiff had the probabilities.
Present: Truax, P. J., Scott and Dugro, JJ.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
32 Misc. 706, 65 N.Y.S. 1132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flanagan-v-metropolitan-street-railway-co-nyappterm-1900.