Flanagan v. Ingersoll

244 A.D. 725

Opinion

Order denying the motion of the petitioner for an order of mandamus directing the borough president of Brooklyn to reinstate petitioner in his position as commissioner of buildings for said borough unanimously affirmed, with costs, as a matter of law and not in the exercise of discretion. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Seudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Flanagan v. Ingersoll, 244 A.D. 725 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

244 A.D. 725 (Flanagan v. Ingersoll) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.