Flamm v. Bethlehem Steel Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Flamm v. Bethlehem Steel Co.

10 A.D.2d 881, 202 N.Y.S.2d 222, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10501

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 25, 1960

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 10 A.D.2d 881 (Flamm v. Bethlehem Steel Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Flamm v. Bethlehem Steel Co., 10 A.D.2d 881, 202 N.Y.S.2d 222, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10501 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for fraud, arising out of an alleged conspiracy between defendants whereby plaintiff was deprived of his rights to compensation under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (U. S. Code, tit. 33, § 981 et seq.), defendant Bethlehem Steel Company appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered March 25, 1959, denying its motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to subdivision 1 of rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice on the ground that the court has no jurisdiction of the subject of the action. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. No question other than the one relating to the jurisdiction of the subject matter has been considered or decided. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur. [18 Misc 2d 154.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for fraud, arising out of an alleged conspiracy between defendants whereby plaintiff was deprived of his rights to compensation under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (U. S. Code, tit. 33, § 981 et seq.), defendant Bethlehem Steel Company appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered March 25, 1959, denying its motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to subdivision 1 of rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice on the ground that the court has no jurisdiction of the subject of the action. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. No question other than the one relating to the jurisdiction of the subject matter has been considered or decided. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur. [18 Misc 2d 154.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 A.D.2d 881, 202 N.Y.S.2d 222, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10501, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flamm-v-bethlehem-steel-co-nyappdiv-1960.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack