FLAMILY v. City of Orlando

14 So. 3d 254, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9756, 2009 WL 2048957

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We review this case on remand from the Florida Supreme Court. See Sanders v. City of Orlando, 997 So.2d 1089 (Fla.2008). Claimant raises one issue on appeal, while the City raises four cross-appeal issues.

Claimant argues that the JCC erred in ruling the City was not estopped from denying compensability. We conclude that the JCC did not err in rejecting Claimant’s estoppel argument. Further, we affirm the issues raised on cross-appeal without discussion.

The JCC’s final order is AFFIRMED.

HAWKES, C.J., KAHN and THOMAS, JJ., concur.