Flake v. High Point Perpetual Building & Loan Ass'n
169 S.E. 223, 204 N.C. 650, 1933 N.C. LEXIS 223
Opinion
Tbe plaintiff has received benefit of tbe surplus proceeds derived from tbe sale of tbe property, and voluntarily rented tbe premises from tbe purchaser, hence, it would seem tbat any rights be may have bad on account of tbe alleged wrongful foreclosure have been waived by bis ratification.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Flake v. High Point Perpetual Building & Loan Ass'n, 169 S.E. 223, 204 N.C. 650, 1933 N.C. LEXIS 223 (N.C. 1933).
169 S.E. 223 (Flake v. High Point Perpetual Building & Loan Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Shaikh v. Burwell
412 S.E.2d 924 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1992)
Leonard v. Pell
289 S.E.2d 140 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1982)