Flair International Corp. v. Heisler

276 A.D.2d 743, 717 N.Y.S.2d 889, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10971

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for unfair competition, the plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gowan, J.), dated November 9, 1999, as denied that branch of their motion which was for leave to renew the sua sponte dismissal of the complaint insofar as asserted against the defendant Reiner Sales Co., Inc.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiffs’ contention on appeal, the Supreme Court properly denied their motion for leave to renew (see, CPLR 2221). Ritter, J. P., Santucci, Goldstein and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Flair International Corp. v. Heisler, 276 A.D.2d 743, 717 N.Y.S.2d 889, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10971 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

276 A.D.2d 743 (Flair International Corp. v. Heisler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.