Flaig v. McNab

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Flaig v. McNab

83 A.D.2d 891, 443 N.Y.S.2d 698, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15295

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 27, 1981

StatusPublished

This text of 83 A.D.2d 891 (Flaig v. McNab) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Flaig v. McNab, 83 A.D.2d 891, 443 N.Y.S.2d 698, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15295 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding, inter alia, to validate petitions resulting in the designation of the petitioner as a candidate in the Conservative Party Primary Election to be held on September 10,1981 for the public office of Supervisor, Town of Brookhaven, the appeal, as limited by the appellant’s brief, is from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated August 22, 1981, as dismissed the proceeding. Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, for the reasons set forth in the decision of Mr. Justice Baisley at Special Term (see Matter of Fotopoulos v Board of Elections of City of N.Y., 45 NY2d 807; Matter of Di Lorenzo v Heffernan, 187 Misc 766, affd 271 App Div 802, affd 296 NY 687). In addition, we note that the designating petition of John Ray was invalid because a certificate of authorization by the Conservative Party was never filed (see Matter of Quinn v Power, 28 AD2d 687). Mangano, J. P., Rabin, Margett and Thompson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding, inter alia, to validate petitions resulting in the designation of the petitioner as a candidate in the Conservative Party Primary Election to be held on September 10,1981 for the public office of Supervisor, Town of Brookhaven, the appeal, as limited by the appellant’s brief, is from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated August 22, 1981, as dismissed the proceeding. Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, for the reasons set forth in the decision of Mr. Justice Baisley at Special Term (see Matter of Fotopoulos v Board of Elections of City of N.Y., 45 NY2d 807; Matter of Di Lorenzo v Heffernan, 187 Misc 766, affd 271 App Div 802, affd 296 NY 687). In addition, we note that the designating petition of John Ray was invalid because a certificate of authorization by the Conservative Party was never filed (see Matter of Quinn v Power, 28 AD2d 687). Mangano, J. P., Rabin, Margett and Thompson, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

83 A.D.2d 891, 443 N.Y.S.2d 698, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flaig-v-mcnab-nyappdiv-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack