Flaherty v. Norwood Engineering Co.

51 N.E. 463, 172 Mass. 134
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedOctober 21, 1898
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 51 N.E. 463 (Flaherty v. Norwood Engineering Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Flaherty v. Norwood Engineering Co., 51 N.E. 463, 172 Mass. 134 (Mass. 1898).

Opinion

Hammond, J.

Considering among other things shown by the evidence the dangerous character of the molten iron, what was to be done with it, the nature of the appliances to be used in handling it, the infrequency of their use, the degree of knowledge of the plaintiff and the general scope of his duties, we are of opinion that the questions whether the plaintiff was in the exercise of due care, whether the appliances were reasonably safe and proper, whether there was any negligence on the part of the defendant as to those appliances, and whether the plaintiff knew and appreciated, or ought to have known and appreciated the danger, were all questions of fact for the jury.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ryan v. Fall River Iron Works Co.
86 N.E. 310 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
51 N.E. 463, 172 Mass. 134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flaherty-v-norwood-engineering-co-mass-1898.