Flaherty v. Kelly

51 Cal. 145
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1875·No. No. 4440·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

By the Court:

It is settled that a District Court has no jurisdiction- do enjoin a judgment rendered in another District Court. (Crowley v. Davis, 37 Cal. 269.)

The circumstance that the judge of the court in which the judgment sought to be enjoined was rendered, is disqualified to sit in the case, does not constitute an exception to the rule. The case must, under such circumstances, be brought in the court in which the judgment was, rendered, and there dealt with as any other case pending in a court in which the judge is disqualified.

Judgment and order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Flaherty v. Kelly, 51 Cal. 145 (Cal. 1875).

51 Cal. 145 (Flaherty v. Kelly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Estate of Iglesias v. Bolívar
11 P.R. 548 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1906)
Cochrane v. McDonald
5 Coffey 235 (California Superior Court, San Francisco County, 1895)