Flagstar Bank v. GHAFOORI

272 S.W.3d 392, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1581, 2008 WL 4710791
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 28, 2008·No. ED 90924·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Theresa Ghafoori (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s Order and Judgment granting Flagstar Bank’s (Respondent) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and denying Appellant’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, and quieting title for certain property in favor of Respondent. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that Respondent is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. ITT Commercial Fin. Corp. v. Mid-Am. Marine Supply Corp., 854 S.W.2d 371, 376 (Mo.banc 1993). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Flagstar Bank v. GHAFOORI, 272 S.W.3d 392, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1581, 2008 WL 4710791 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

272 S.W.3d 392 (Flagstar Bank v. GHAFOORI) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.
854 S.W.2d 371 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1993)