Flagstar Bank v. GHAFOORI
Opinion
ORDER
Theresa Ghafoori (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s Order and Judgment granting Flagstar Bank’s (Respondent) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and denying Appellant’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, and quieting title for certain property in favor of Respondent. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that Respondent is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. ITT Commercial Fin. Corp. v. Mid-Am. Marine Supply Corp., 854 S.W.2d 371, 376 (Mo.banc 1993). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
272 S.W.3d 392 (Flagstar Bank v. GHAFOORI) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.