Flagstar Bank, FSB v. Whitley

Missouri Court of Appeals

Flagstar Bank, FSB v. Whitley

501 S.W.3d 506

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 18, 2016·No. No. ED 103559; ED103380·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Appellants Carol A. Whitley and John M. Kurz appeal the trial court’s judgment denying them separate motions to vacate or amend summary judgment in favor of Flagstar Bank, FSB and for new trial. Appellant Whitley also appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Flagstar. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Appellants Carol A. Whitley and John M. Kurz appeal the trial court’s judgment denying them separate motions to vacate or amend summary judgment in favor of Flagstar Bank, FSB and for new trial. Appellant Whitley also appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Flagstar. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Flagstar Bank, FSB v. Whitley, 501 S.W.3d 506 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

501 S.W.3d 506 (Flagstar Bank, FSB v. Whitley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.