Flagstar Bank, FSB v. Reinhold

927 N.E.2d 9, 125 Ohio St. 3d 1436
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 26, 2010·No. 2010-0508·Published

Opinion

Hamilton App. No. C-090166. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Entry filed March 3, 2010:

“Under R.C. 2305.09(D), does a cause of action for professional negligence accrue on the date that the negligent act is committed, or on the date that the negligent act causes actual damages?”

The conflict eases are JP Morgan Chase Bank NA v. Lanning, Stark App. No. 2007CA00223, 2008-Ohio-893; Fritz v. Brunner Cox, L.L.P., 142 Ohio App.3d 664, 756 N.E.2d 740; and Gray v. Estate of Barry, 101 Ohio App.3d 764, 656 N.E.2d 729.

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2010-0511, Flagstar Bank, FSB v. Reinhold, Hamilton App. No. C-090166.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Flagstar Bank, FSB v. Reinhold, 927 N.E.2d 9, 125 Ohio St. 3d 1436 (Ohio 2010).

927 N.E.2d 9 (Flagstar Bank, FSB v. Reinhold) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gray v. Estate of Barry
656 N.E.2d 729 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1995)
Fritz v. Bruner Cox, L.L.P.
756 N.E.2d 740 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2001)
Jp Morgan Chase Bank v. Lanning, 2007ca00223 (3-3-2008)
2008 Ohio 893 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2008)