Flagg v. Sloan
This text of 16 Ind. 432 (Flagg v. Sloan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In vacation of the Circuit Court, the judge thereof granted a temporary injunction against appellants, without notice to, or appearance by, the party enjoined. At the next term of the Court the parties appeared, and'appellants filed a demurrer to the petition for an injunction. Before the questions of law raised by the demurrer were determined, this appeal was prayed, and granted, from the order made in vacation.
It is objected here, that the parties affected by the order should have moved before the judge, or in the Court below, to set aside said order and dissolve said injunction, before they can present the questions here sought to be presented; as it is insisted that this case falls within the spirit of various rulings in this Court, in reference to appeals from judgments [433]*433by default, &c. We do not think so, for the reason, among others, that the statute expressly authorizes an appeal from an interlocutory order granting an injunction in vacation. 2 B. S.j p. 162. It was erroneous to grant it without notice. 2 B. S., p. 60 ; 6 Ind. 303.
As this was, in form, a temporary injunction, and not a restraining order merely, the question does not arise as to whether there is any appeal from an order falling within the latter class.
j udgment is reversed, with costs. Cause remanded, &c.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
16 Ind. 432, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flagg-v-sloan-ind-1861.