Flagg v. Moses
222 A.D. 821
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Flagg v. Moses. Read the opinion of the Court — 222 A.D. 762 →
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, without costs. We are of opinion that we may not, by certifying questions, dispense with the constitutional requirement that defendants stipulate for judgment absolute in the event of affirmance. (Mundt v. Glokner, 24 App. Div. 110; 160 N. Y. 571; New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company v. State of New York, 166 id. 286; Smith v. Furst, 188 App. Div. 892; Gross & Son v. State of New York, 243 N. Y. 629.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Seeger, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Flagg v. Moses, 222 A.D. 821 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).
222 A.D. 821 (Flagg v. Moses) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mundt v. . Glokner
55 N.E. 297 (New York Court of Appeals, 1899)
Fred E. Gross & Son v. State
154 N.E. 634 (New York Court of Appeals, 1926)
Mundt v. Glokner
24 A.D. 110 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1897)
Smith v. Furst
188 A.D. 892 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1919)