Flackhamer v. Himes

53 A. 46, 24 R.I. 306, 1902 R.I. LEXIS 77
CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island
DecidedJuly 17, 1902
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 53 A. 46 (Flackhamer v. Himes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Flackhamer v. Himes, 53 A. 46, 24 R.I. 306, 1902 R.I. LEXIS 77 (R.I. 1902).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

(1) It appears in this case that the complainant *307 had a written contract with the respondent, Laura A. Himes, to convey to him certain real estate; and that, at the same time, she was bound by another contract, previously given, to convey it to the respondent Potter. Under this latter contract she has conveyed the estate to Potter, and, so far as appears, he was a purchaser in good faith and without notice of complainant’s contract.

F. P. Oiuen, for complainant. J. C. Collins, Jr., for respondent.

As the respondent has conveyed the estate, and as we do . not find that such conveyance was fraudulent as to the complainant, no decree for specific performance can be entered.

The complainant has only his remedy at law.

Bill dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Childs v. Reed
202 P. 685 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1921)
Whitney Co. v. Smith
126 P. 1000 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
53 A. 46, 24 R.I. 306, 1902 R.I. LEXIS 77, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flackhamer-v-himes-ri-1902.