Flack v. Humphreys

Ohio Supreme Court

Flack v. Humphreys

24 Ohio St. (N.S.) 330

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 15, 1873·Published

Opinion

By the Court.

The order of the county commissioners, under the provisions of the act of January 16, 1873 (76 Ohio L., pp. 10 and 11, sec. 20), to the county auditor, makes it the duty of such auditor to draw his warrant as therein directed; and the board of control, created by the act of -March 13, 1872 (69 Ohio L., p. 40, see. 7), are invested with no authority to act in such cases.

Peremptory writ awarded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

The order of the county commissioners, under the provisions of the act of January 16, 1873 (76 Ohio L., pp. 10 and 11, sec. 20), to the county auditor, makes it the duty of such auditor to draw his warrant as therein directed; and the board of control, created by the act of -March 13, 1872 (69 Ohio L., p. 40, see. 7), are invested with no authority to act in such cases.

Peremptory writ awarded.

Flack v. Humphreys, 24 Ohio St. (N.S.) 330 (Ohio 1873).

Pincite

24 Ohio St. (N.S.) 330 (Flack v. Humphreys) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.