Flack v. Eager

4 Johns. 185
New York Supreme Court·Decided February 15, 1809·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendants were entitled to mané this application at any time; and they have applied, as soon as they were called on, as bail. The case of Humphrey v. Leite (4 Burr. 2107.) is in point. There has been a waiver of bail in this case, and no formal notice of the waiver was necessary. The motion must be granted, with costs.

Rule granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Flack v. Eager, 4 Johns. 185 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1809).

4 Johns. 185 (Flack v. Eager) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McIntyre v. Borst
26 How. Pr. 411 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1864)
Smith v. Dennis
3 Ala. 248 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1841)
People ex rel. Works v. Judges of the Court of Common Pleas
1 Cow. 54 (New York Supreme Court, 1823)