Flack v. Eager
4 Johns. 185
This text of 4 Johns. 185 (Flack v. Eager) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Flack v. Eager, 4 Johns. 185 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1809).
Opinion
The defendants were entitled to mané this application at any time; and they have applied, as soon as they were called on, as bail. The case of Humphrey v. Leite (4 Burr. 2107.) is in point. There has been a waiver of bail in this case, and no formal notice of the waiver was necessary. The motion must be granted, with costs.
Rule granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
McIntyre v. Borst
26 How. Pr. 411 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1864)
Smith v. Dennis
3 Ala. 248 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1841)
People ex rel. Works v. Judges of the Court of Common Pleas
1 Cow. 54 (New York Supreme Court, 1823)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
4 Johns. 185, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flack-v-eager-nysupct-1809.