Flack v. Big Cedar Grove Cemetery Association

155 N.E. 921, 86 Ind. App. 740, 1927 Ind. App. LEXIS 192
Indiana Court of Appeals·Decided June 10, 1927·No. No. 12,900.·Published

Opinion

Nichols, J.

— Affirmed on the authority of Lynch v. Milwaukee Harvester Co. (1903), 159 Ind. 675, 65 N. E. 1025. See, also, Hall v. McDonald (1908), 171 Ind. 9, 85 N. E. 707; State, ex rel., v. Davisson (1910), 174 Ind. 705, 93 N. E. 6; Inskeep v. Gilbert (1910), 174 Ind. 726, 93 N. E. 8; Wise v. Larkin (1908), 41 Ind. App. 433, 84 N. E. 25; Southern Express Co. v. Shurz (1913), 55 Ind. App. 213, 103 N. E. 667.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Flack v. Big Cedar Grove Cemetery Association, 155 N.E. 921, 86 Ind. App. 740, 1927 Ind. App. LEXIS 192 (Ind. Ct. App. 1927).

155 N.E. 921 (Flack v. Big Cedar Grove Cemetery Association) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lynch v. Milwaukee Harvester Co.
65 N.E. 1025 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1903)
Hall v. McDonald
85 N.E. 707 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1908)
State ex rel. Drudge v. Davisson
93 N.E. 6 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1910)
Inskeep v. Gilbert
93 N.E. 8 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1910)
Wise v. Larkin
84 N.E. 25 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1908)
Southern Express Co. v. Schurz
103 N.E. 667 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1913)