Flaacke v. Peck

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Flaacke v. Peck

212 A.D. 883

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1925·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. It is unnecessary for plaintiff to examine defendant in order to obtain information upon which to frame his complaint, as the only information which he lacks is the exact amount of the recovery to he demanded. (Newman v. Porter, 201 App. Div. 335.) Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox, Kelby and Young, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. It is unnecessary for plaintiff to examine defendant in order to obtain information upon which to frame his complaint, as the only information which he lacks is the exact amount of the recovery to he demanded. (Newman v. Porter, 201 App. Div. 335.) Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox, Kelby and Young, JJ., concur.

Flaacke v. Peck, 212 A.D. 883 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

212 A.D. 883 (Flaacke v. Peck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related