Fla. Cen. & Pen. R. R. v. Hays
25 S.E. 689, 99 Ga. 290
This text of 25 S.E. 689 (Fla. Cen. & Pen. R. R. v. Hays) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Fla. Cen. & Pen. R. R. v. Hays, 25 S.E. 689, 99 Ga. 290 (Ga. 1896).
Opinion
The questions -of law presented in this case have been -settled by repeated adjudications of this court; following the doctrine laid down in the case of Harris v. Central Railroad, 78 Ga. 525, the allowance of the amendment to the declaration was proper; the trial judge committed no error, and the evidence warranted the verdict. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
City of Columbus v. Anglin
48 S.E. 318 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
25 S.E. 689, 99 Ga. 290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fla-cen-pen-r-r-v-hays-ga-1896.