Fla. Cen. & Pen. R. R. v. Hays
25 S.E. 689, 99 Ga. 290
Opinion
The questions -of law presented in this case have been -settled by repeated adjudications of this court; following the doctrine laid down in the case of Harris v. Central Railroad, 78 Ga. 525, the allowance of the amendment to the declaration was proper; the trial judge committed no error, and the evidence warranted the verdict. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fla. Cen. & Pen. R. R. v. Hays, 25 S.E. 689, 99 Ga. 290 (Ga. 1896).
25 S.E. 689 (Fla. Cen. & Pen. R. R. v. Hays) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
City of Columbus v. Anglin
48 S.E. 318 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)