F.L. v. State

528 So. 2d 976, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1743, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3186, 1988 WL 74808
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 22, 1988·No. No. 87-2686·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals the final order adjudicating him to be a delinquent juvenile. The sole issue he raises on this appeal is the failure of the trial judge to conduct a hearing pursuant to Richardson v. State, 246 So.2d 771 (Fla.1971), before excluding the testimony of appellant’s mother for not having been listed as a witness in pretrial discovery. It is undisputed that there was a failure to conduct such a hearing. We have searched the record to determine whether the trial judge conducted the equivalent of such a hearing but find no evidence that such was the case. We are prohibited from considering whether the failure to conduct the Richardson hearing was harmless error. We, therefore, must reverse and remand for a new trial.

CAMPBELL, C.J., and SCHEB and LEHAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

F.L. v. State, 528 So. 2d 976, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1743, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3186, 1988 WL 74808 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

528 So. 2d 976 (F.L. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McCann v. McCann
528 So. 2d 976 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)