F.L. Engelman & Associates, Inc. v. Monroe Mendelsohn Research, Inc.

210 A.D.2d 28, 618 N.Y.S.2d 807, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11828

This text of 210 A.D.2d 28 (F.L. Engelman & Associates, Inc. v. Monroe Mendelsohn Research, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
F.L. Engelman & Associates, Inc. v. Monroe Mendelsohn Research, Inc., 210 A.D.2d 28, 618 N.Y.S.2d 807, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11828 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered July 28, 1994, which granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action to the extent of dismissing the causes of action brought under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO; 18 USC §§ 1961-1968), unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff’s RICO causes of action, alleging that defendants are an enterprise that engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity in fraudulently inducing plaintiff to purchase stock in the wronged corporation over the 10-year life of plaintiff’s venture with defendants through the medium of the wronged corporation, were properly dismissed as amounting to nothing more than a simple fraud. A scheme that has a limited, terminating goal is not sufficiently continuing to constitute an enterprise within the meaning of RICO (Beck v Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co., 820 F2d 46, 51-52, cert denied 484 US 1005). That the fraud continued for some 10 years does not negate its essentially finite nature (see, East 32nd St. Assocs. v Jones Lang Wootton USA, 191 AD2d 68, 73). We have considered plaintiff’s remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Ross and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

East 32nd Street Associates v. Jones Lang Wootton USA
191 A.D.2d 68 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
210 A.D.2d 28, 618 N.Y.S.2d 807, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11828, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fl-engelman-associates-inc-v-monroe-mendelsohn-research-inc-nyappdiv-1994.