Fiveash v. State

2014 Ark. App. 402
CourtCourt of Appeals of Arkansas
DecidedJune 18, 2014
DocketCR-13-257
StatusPublished

This text of 2014 Ark. App. 402 (Fiveash v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fiveash v. State, 2014 Ark. App. 402 (Ark. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

Cite as 2014 Ark. App. 402

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION IV No. CR-13-257

Opinion Delivered June 18, 2014 TIMOTHY ALLEN FIVEASH APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE BOONE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT V. [NO. CR2012-149-4]

HONORABLE ROBERT STATE OF ARKANSAS McCORKINDALE, II, JUDGE APPELLEE AFFIRMED; MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED

PHILLIP T. WHITEAKER, Judge

Timothy Allen Fiveash appeals from his Boone County Circuit Court convictions for

driving on a suspended license, careless or prohibited driving, failure to wear a seat belt, no

license tags, no proof of liability insurance, and obstruction of government operation.

Appellant’s counsel has filed a motion to withdraw, pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S.

738 (1967), and in compliance with Rule 4-3(k) of the Rules of the Arkansas Supreme Court

and Court of Appeals, stating that there are no meritorious grounds to support an appeal. The

motion is accompanied by an abstract, brief, and addendum referring to everything in the

record that might arguably support an appeal, including all motions, objections, and requests

decided adversely to appellant and a statement of reasons why none of those rulings would be

a meritorious ground for reversal. The clerk of this court mailed appellant a copy of his Cite as 2014 Ark. App. 402

counsel’s brief at his last known address, notifying him of his right to file a pro se statement

of points for reversal within thirty days. The package was returned as undeliverable.

From our review of the record and the briefs presented to us, we find that there has

been compliance with Rule 4-3(k) and that the appeal is without merit. Accordingly,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted, and the order appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed; motion to withdraw granted.

GLADWIN, C.J., and PITTMAN, J., agree.

Cullen & Co., PLLC, by: Tim J. Cullen, for appellant.

No response.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2014 Ark. App. 402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fiveash-v-state-arkctapp-2014.