Fiveash v. State

676 S.W.2d 769, 12 Ark. App. 391, 1984 Ark. App. LEXIS 1804
Court of Appeals of Arkansas·Decided October 17, 1984·No. CA CR 83-138·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

On February 1, 1984, we affirmed the trial court’s judgment in the above styled case. On October 4, 1984, appellant’s court-appointed attorney filed a motion for attorney’s fee.

In Cristee v. State, 4 Ark. App. 33, 627 S.W.2d 34 (1982), we said that motions for attorney’s fees in these cases should be filed in this court in time for them to be considered at the time the case is considered on its merits. Two years later, in Stefanovich v. State, 10 Ark. App. 233, 662 S.W.2d 476 (1984), we called attention to Cristee and pointed out that failure to file the motion in time for it to be considered at the time the case is considered on its merits could prevent the allowance of an attorney’s fee.

We allowed a fee in both of those cases, but the motions were filed within three months of the case decision and in the same fiscal year. Here, eight months have elapsed and on July 1, 1984, a new fiscal year intervened.

Our power to allow the fee at this late date is suspect; moreover, we do not think one should be allowed under the circumstances.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fiveash v. State, 676 S.W.2d 769, 12 Ark. App. 391, 1984 Ark. App. LEXIS 1804 (Ark. Ct. App. 1984).

676 S.W.2d 769 (Fiveash v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bell v. State
935 S.W.2d 539 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1996)
Houston v. State
862 S.W.2d 292 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 1993)
Terrell v. State
796 S.W.2d 348 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 1990)
Scott v. State
775 S.W.2d 513 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 1989)