Five Towns Nissan, LLC v. Universal Underwriters Insurance
This text of 135 A.D.3d 416 (Five Towns Nissan, LLC v. Universal Underwriters Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jeffrey K. Oing, J.), entered August 6, 2014, which denied plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment against defendant Universal Underwriters Insurance Company, and granted Universal’s oral cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the breach of contract cause of action against it, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
The motion court correctly applied the unlimited aggregate deductible set forth in policy endorsement No. 001, rejecting plaintiff’s contention that the limited deductible set forth in the certificate insurance governed. The certificate was not proof of insurance and contained a broad disclaimer that it was a contract or conferred any rights on the certificate holder (see Buccini v 1568 Broadway Assoc., 250 AD2d 466, 469 [1st Dept 1998]). Under the circumstances, assuming the argument is properly raised at this juncture, nor is the insurer estopped *417 from denying the effectiveness of the deductible set forth in the certificate, as the disclaimer renders plaintiff’s claimed reliance on the certificate unreasonable (cf. Bucon, Inc. v Pennsylvania Mfg. Assn. Ins. Co., 151 AD2d 207, 210 [3d Dept 1989]). Concur — Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, Saxe and Moskowitz, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
135 A.D.3d 416, 21 N.Y.S.3d 880, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/five-towns-nissan-llc-v-universal-underwriters-insurance-nyappdiv-2016.