Five Crown Holdings LLC, Series 1 v. Mansfield Independent School District

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 20, 2014
Docket02-13-00274-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Five Crown Holdings LLC, Series 1 v. Mansfield Independent School District (Five Crown Holdings LLC, Series 1 v. Mansfield Independent School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Five Crown Holdings LLC, Series 1 v. Mansfield Independent School District, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00274-CV

FIVE CROWN HOLDINGS LLC, APPELLANT SERIES 1

V.

MANSFIELD INDEPENDENT APPELLEE SCHOOL DISTRICT

------------

FROM THE 236TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 AND JUDGMENT ------------

On August 22, 2013, we notified appellant for the second time that only a

licensed attorney may appear and represent a corporation. 2 We stated that we

would dismiss this appeal for prosecution unless, by Monday, September 23,

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. 2 Kunstoplast of Am., Inc. v. Formosa Plastics Corp., USA, 937 S.W.2d 455, 456 (Tex. 1996). 2013, a licensed attorney filed a notice of appearance with this court. 3 We

granted extensions of time on September 27, 2013, October 29, 2013, and

December 13, 2013 to allow Appellant to obtain counsel. In our December 13,

2013 order granting an extension, we stated, “A notice of appearance must be

filed on or before Monday, December 23, 2013. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS

WILL BE GRANTED.”

On December 23, 2013, Appellant filed a fourth motion for an extension of

time to obtain counsel. That motion is DENIED.

Because, despite our directive, no licensed attorney has filed a notice of

appearance in this case since the notice of appeal was filed more than six

months ago, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. 4 Appellant shall pay

all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED: February 20, 2014

3 See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b)–(c). 4 See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b)–(c), 43.2(f).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kunstoplast of America, Inc. v. Formosa Plastics Corp.
937 S.W.2d 455 (Texas Supreme Court, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Five Crown Holdings LLC, Series 1 v. Mansfield Independent School District, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/five-crown-holdings-llc-series-1-v-mansfield-indep-texapp-2014.