Five Boro Psychological Servs., P.C. v. MVAIC
This text of Five Boro Psychological Servs., P.C. v. MVAIC (Five Boro Psychological Servs., P.C. v. MVAIC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
against
MVAIC, Appellant.
Marshall & Marshall, PLLC (Naim Peress of counsel), for appellant. Gary Tsirelman, P.C., for respondent (no brief filed).
Appeal from a judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Robin S. Garson, J.), entered May 28, 2015. The judgment, entered pursuant to a decision of that court dated September 10, 2014, after a nonjury trial, awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $958.32.
ORDERED that, on the court's own motion, the notice of appeal from the decision dated September 10, 2014 is deemed a premature notice of appeal from the judgment entered May 28, 2015 (see CPLR 5520 [c]); and it is further,
ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, with $30 costs, and the matter is remitted to the Civil Court for the entry of a judgment in favor of defendant dismissing the complaint.
In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, the sole issue at a nonjury trial was whether plaintiff's assignor was a "qualified person," and, thus, whether she was eligible to recover no-fault benefits from defendant Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation (sued herein as MVAIC). Following the trial, the Civil Court awarded plaintiff judgment in the principal sum of $958.32.
For the reasons stated in Village Med. Supply, Inc. v MVAIC (53 Misc 3d 134[A], 2016 NY Slip Op 51421[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2016]), the judgment is reversed and the matter is remitted to the Civil Court for the entry of a judgment in favor of defendant dismissing the complaint.
PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and ELLIOT, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: May 25, 2018
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Five Boro Psychological Servs., P.C. v. MVAIC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/five-boro-psychological-servs-pc-v-mvaic-nyappterm-2018.