Fiumara v. Texaco, Inc.

310 F.2d 737
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided December 20, 1962·No. No. 14073·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the record we are of the opinion that the District Court did not err in granting the motion of the defendants for summary judgment.

The Order and Judgment of the District Court of May 4, 1962 granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fiumara v. Texaco, Inc., 310 F.2d 737 (3d Cir. 1962).

310 F.2d 737 (Fiumara v. Texaco, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sventek v. County of Warren
8 Pa. D. & C.4th 478 (Warren County Court of Common Pleas, 1991)
Scalise v. LeTrent
7 Pa. D. & C.4th 394 (Warren County Court of Common Pleas, 1990)
Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.
513 F. Supp. 1100 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1981)
Schacter v. Albert
239 A.2d 841 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1968)
Fiumara v. Texaco, Inc.
231 A.2d 297 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1967)