Fitzwater v. Ray

Eighth Circuit

Fitzwater v. Ray

352 F. App'x 125

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided November 13, 2009·No. No. 08-2955·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jerald Fitzwater, Iris Fitzwater, and Bishop A. Louis Vaughn, Sr., appeal the District Court’s¹ order dismissing their complaint without prejudice for failure to comply with an order directing them to file within fourteen days an amended complaint in conformity with Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Following careful review, we find no abuse of discretion. See Mangan v. Weinberger, 848 F.2d 909, 911 (8th Cir.1988) (abuse of discretion review of Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b) dismissal for failure to comply with Fed. R.Civ.P. 8) cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1013, 109 S.Ct. 802, 102 L.Ed.2d 793 (1989). We further conclude that all other issues and arguments raised by plaintiffs on appeal are meritless.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Jerald Fitzwater, Iris Fitzwater, and Bishop A. Louis Vaughn, Sr., appeal the District Court’s¹ order dismissing their complaint without prejudice for failure to comply with an order directing them to file within fourteen days an amended complaint in conformity with Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Following careful review, we find no abuse of discretion. See Mangan v. Weinberger, 848 F.2d 909, 911 (8th Cir.1988) (abuse of discretion review of Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b) dismissal for failure to comply with Fed. R.Civ.P. 8) cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1013, 109 S.Ct. 802, 102 L.Ed.2d 793 (1989). We further conclude that all other issues and arguments raised by plaintiffs on appeal are meritless.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Footnotes

Fitzwater v. Ray, 352 F. App'x 125 (8th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

352 F. App'x 125 (Fitzwater v. Ray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Footnotes

Related