Fitzwater v. Ray
This text of 352 F. App'x 125 (Fitzwater v. Ray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Jerald Fitzwater, Iris Fitzwater, and Bishop A. Louis Vaughn, Sr., appeal the District Court’s1 order dismissing their complaint without prejudice for failure to comply with an order directing them to file within fourteen days an amended complaint in conformity with Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Following careful review, we find no abuse of discretion. See Mangan v. Weinberger, 848 F.2d 909, 911 (8th Cir.1988) (abuse of discretion review of Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b) dismissal for failure to comply with Fed. R.Civ.P. 8) cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1013, 109 S.Ct. 802, 102 L.Ed.2d 793 (1989). We further conclude that all other issues and arguments raised by plaintiffs on appeal are meritless.
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
352 F. App'x 125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fitzwater-v-ray-ca8-2009.