Fitzsimmons v. Liuni

26 A.D.2d 980, 274 N.Y.S.2d 798, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3073
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 21, 1966
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 26 A.D.2d 980 (Fitzsimmons v. Liuni) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fitzsimmons v. Liuni, 26 A.D.2d 980, 274 N.Y.S.2d 798, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3073 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appeal from a judgment of the Family Court of Ulster County which sustained a writ of habeas corpus directed to respondents-appellants Liuni and awarded custody of Elizabeth St. John, an infant, to petitioner-respondent Commissioner of Public Welfare in a proceeding commenced in the Supreme Court, Ulster County, and by order of said court referred to said Family Court for hearing and determination. It is conceded that the Judge of the Family Court, by whom the proceeding was heard and determined, is a first cousin of the wife of the respondent Commissioner. Consequently, he was disqualified from acting, being “related by * * * affinity to [a] party to the controversy within the sixth degree ”, and the proceedings before him were and are void. (Judiciary Law, § 14; People ex rel. Union Bag & Paper Corp. v. Gilbert, 143 Misc. 287, affd. 236 App. Div. 873.) The proceedings had in the Supreme Court prior to the reference were, of course, valid and under all the circumstances of this particular case, the matter should be remitted to that court. Consideration should there be given to the propriety of designating a guardian ad litem to represent the infant concerned and to the advisability of proceeding with the hearing and determination of the ease in that court; but in each respect we prefer to leave the Special Term’s discretion untrammeled. Judgment reversed, on the law, [981]*981without costs, and thereupon vacated and set aside and proceeding remitted to the Supreme Court for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. Stay continued. Order signed. Gibson, P. J.; Herlihy, Reynolds, Staley, Jr., and Brink, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Adoption of Jessica XX
77 A.D.2d 381 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
In re Redinger
107 Misc. 2d 368 (NYC Family Court, 1980)
In re Martz
102 Misc. 2d 102 (NYC Family Court, 1979)
People v. Reeves
57 A.D.2d 1015 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Mundie v. Nassau County Department of Social Services
88 Misc. 2d 273 (New York Supreme Court, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 A.D.2d 980, 274 N.Y.S.2d 798, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3073, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fitzsimmons-v-liuni-nyappdiv-1966.